You are currently viewing IVUS or FFR for ambiguous LM assessment

IVUS or FFR for ambiguous LM assessment

EBC - ON DEMAND

IVUS or FFR for ambiguous LM assessment

European Bifurcation Club 2012 – EBC 2012 – Castelldefels, Spain

Left main session

IVUS or FFR for ambiguous LM assessment

Author: Jose Ma de la Torre Hernandez, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain

 

CONCLUSION

  • IVUS and FFR are both safe methods to accurately assess the severity of ambiguous LM lesions.
  • IVUS:
    • An “universal definite cutoff value” for the LM lumen does not exist.
    • There is a narrow range for the LM MLA around 6 mm2 and modulation by other factors is required to make an individual case-based decision
    • Useful in case of LM PCI
  • FFR:
    • Definite cut-off value (0.8). (Suggested gray zone 0.8-0.85)
    • No characterization of LM disease (specially in bifurcations)
    • Not fully reliable in presence of severe LAD / LCx disease

 

Download here

Leave a Reply