You are currently viewing Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I Clinical outcome 5 years after routine T-Stenting versus provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions using sirolimus-eluting stents

Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I Clinical outcome 5 years after routine T-Stenting versus provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions using sirolimus-eluting stents

EBC - ON DEMAND

Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I Clinical outcome 5 years after routine T-Stenting versus provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions using sirolimus-eluting stents

European Bifurcation Club 2015 – EBC 2015 – Athens, Greece

News (1)

Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I Clinical outcome 5 years after routine T-Stenting versus provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions using sirolimus-eluting stents

Author: M. Ferenc, MD, Universität Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen, Germany

 

OBJECTIVE

We analysed the long term follow-up after percutaneus treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with sirolimus-eluting stents (CYPHER) routine T-stenting of both main and the side branch reduces the restenosis in the side branch compared with provisional T-stenting.

CONCLUSION

  • During 5-year follow-up, routine T-stenting offered no advantage over provisional T-stenting with respect to TLR or MACE.
  • Double stenting compared with single stenting was associated with an increased 5-year risk of stent thrombosis.

 

Download here

Leave a Reply