You are currently viewing The European Bifurcation Coronary study: a randomised comparison of provisional T-stenting versus a systema.c TWO stent strategy in large calibre true bifurcations

The European Bifurcation Coronary study: a randomised comparison of provisional T-stenting versus a systema.c TWO stent strategy in large calibre true bifurcations

EBC - ON DEMAND

The European Bifurcation Coronary study: a randomised comparison of provisional T-stenting versus a systema.c TWO stent strategy in large calibre true bifurcations

European Bifurcation Club 2015 – EBC 2015 – Athens, Greece

News (1)

The European Bifurcation Coronary study: a randomised comparison of provisional T-stenting versus a systema.c TWO stent strategy in large calibre true bifurcations

Author: David Hildick-Smith,

 

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

  • Randomised trials of “all-comer” bifurcation lesions show that there is no advantage to systematic dual stent strategies.
  • However, these trials included a proportion of patients with no disease in the side branch, or relatively small side branch vessels.
  • Expert consensus suggests that “large” bifurcations with significant length os.al side branch disease may merit a systematic two-stent treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

  • Excellent protocol adherence
  • Procedural success good in both groups
  • Acute Results
  • 12-month Results
    • No significant difference between provisional and culotte techniques even in this highly complex bifurcation population
  • Numerical trends are in keeping with expectations
    • More target vessel revascularisation in the simpler procedure
    • More periprocedural MI and stent thrombosis in the more complex procedure

 

Leave a Reply