You are currently viewing BVS Concerns after Absorb II and III : Operators, device or concept?

BVS Concerns after Absorb II and III : Operators, device or concept?

EBC - ON DEMAND

BVS Concerns after Absorb II and III : Operators, device or concept?

European Bifurcation Club 2017 – EBC 2017 – Porto, Portugal

SESSION 4: BRS for Bifurcation Stenting: After Thrombosis Crisis

BVS Concerns after Absorb II and III : Operators, device or concept?

Author: Yoshinobu Onuma, MD. PhD, Erasmus MC/ Cardialysis, Rotterdam, NL

 

SUMMARY

  • Fully bioresorbable scaffold is designed to provide a temporary mechanical support and thereafter to disappear. In concept, improvement of very late outcomes could occur, after completion of bioresorption (>3 years).
  • After Absorb II and III, meta-analysis demonstrated an increased risk of early/late and very late scaffold thrombosis (up to 2 years), resulting discontinuation of commercial production of Absorb.
  • Occurrence of VLScT is related to underexpansion on IVUS. One of the underlying mechanisms is late structural discontinuities. A few data showed a relation between DAPT discontinuation and VLScT.
  • Appropriate sizing and intense postdilatation may improve the outcome buy achieving better scaffold expansion and better embedment of struts.
  • Improvement of clinical outcomes before completion of bioresorption (Non-inferiority to DES at that timepoint) is essential for BRS. New generation device is warranted (See the last talk of this session)

 

Download here

Leave a Reply