You are currently viewing Randomized comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch. Two-year results in the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

Randomized comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch. Two-year results in the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

EBC - ON DEMAND

Randomized comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch. Two-year results in the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

European Bifurcation Club 2015 – EBC 2015 – Athens, Greece

News (1)

Randomized comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch. Two-year results in the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

Author: Niels R. Holm,

 

CONCLUSION

  • After 2 years, two-stent techniques for treatment of true bifurcation lesions with a large side branch showed no significant reduction in MACE rate compared to provisional side branch stenting
  • Newer generation stents might improve safety ager bifurcation treatment and in particular ager treatment by two-stent techniques

 

Download here

Leave a Reply